For my Unit 2 reflection, I decided to make a timeline on Prezi. I did this because, at the end of the day, technology is simply a product of time itself...
http://prezi.com/zazrzh_axyzh/?utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=copy
Showing posts with label Unit 2. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Unit 2. Show all posts
Monday, March 27, 2017
3/28/17 Project Post
In our writing class, we have explored the complex foundation of technology and how it has influenced institutions such as writing, education, communication, and more. In my first blog post, I decided to investigate various facets of this shift in culture. They ranged from music, to social interactions, to life itself. For my second post, I decided to delve into a pitch that was interesting to me while also relating to my first blog post and the topic of technology itself. I started out by thinking about some of the pertinent points I made in the first post. Sure, the advancement of technology has certainly made us more efficient at doing "things". But what are the side effects? This is when I came up with my pitch. How does technology hinder our relationships? I started exploring intimate relationships mainly, but tech has truly affected the dynamics of all types of relationships. From professional, to friendly, to familial relationships, technology has played a huge part in affecting each one. My argument with regards to this pitch is that it is mostly a negative change that is detrimental to how relationships should work, however there have been some truly groundbreaking inventions because of new technologies.
The first source that I will introduce was one that I actually found when I wasn't even working on my blog. I was scrolling through the Snapchat app and, after flipping through some stories, I decided to read some of the news in the "Discover" tab. The first article that caught my eye was one in the VICE news section. It read: "Long Distance Couples Can Now Use These Robotic Gloves to Do Stuff to Each Other". I thought to myself, wow this definitely relates to my WRT 205 project and I should probably use it as my first source. It was also pretty interesting, so I wanted to start off with it as a hook for the rest of my post. Here is what the snaps read:
When I was in middle school, I was watching the movie "I, Robot" with Will Smith and wondered if fully functioning robots like those would be alive in our lifetime. Reading about robotic gloves made me hearken back to these apparitions. Then I started to think about how far technology has come even since those middle school years with all we have today. If this exists right now, who knows what will fifty years or so from today.
Going back to the article, the company who created the Flex-N-Feel gloves target a consumer market of people in long distance relationships, which are actually more common than I thought. "You can simulate hand holding, touching one's face as a gentle caress, or even a light massage." While the act of touching your partner with robotic gloves when you are not together could be seen as beneficial for faithfulness/non-adulterous reasons, my question that arises is where do we go from here? Are we going to be having sex with robots soon like they do in Westworld? I'm not exactly sure of my stance on this issue, but the implications of this change are certainly there. I'm sure there are plenty of sickos out there who would love to get down and dirty with a robot that looks like a human. The target market is there which is why I believe they can and will exist eventually. But this is where one of the arguments in my first blog post arises. That is technology negatively impacting our human-to-human interactions. If sex robots exist then a lot of people won't even bother trying to make a real connection because they can go home to their robotic girlfriend/boyfriend. It's kind of a depressing thought but its also something that is very likely to happen in the future.
The first source that I will introduce was one that I actually found when I wasn't even working on my blog. I was scrolling through the Snapchat app and, after flipping through some stories, I decided to read some of the news in the "Discover" tab. The first article that caught my eye was one in the VICE news section. It read: "Long Distance Couples Can Now Use These Robotic Gloves to Do Stuff to Each Other". I thought to myself, wow this definitely relates to my WRT 205 project and I should probably use it as my first source. It was also pretty interesting, so I wanted to start off with it as a hook for the rest of my post. Here is what the snaps read:
When I was in middle school, I was watching the movie "I, Robot" with Will Smith and wondered if fully functioning robots like those would be alive in our lifetime. Reading about robotic gloves made me hearken back to these apparitions. Then I started to think about how far technology has come even since those middle school years with all we have today. If this exists right now, who knows what will fifty years or so from today.
Going back to the article, the company who created the Flex-N-Feel gloves target a consumer market of people in long distance relationships, which are actually more common than I thought. "You can simulate hand holding, touching one's face as a gentle caress, or even a light massage." While the act of touching your partner with robotic gloves when you are not together could be seen as beneficial for faithfulness/non-adulterous reasons, my question that arises is where do we go from here? Are we going to be having sex with robots soon like they do in Westworld? I'm not exactly sure of my stance on this issue, but the implications of this change are certainly there. I'm sure there are plenty of sickos out there who would love to get down and dirty with a robot that looks like a human. The target market is there which is why I believe they can and will exist eventually. But this is where one of the arguments in my first blog post arises. That is technology negatively impacting our human-to-human interactions. If sex robots exist then a lot of people won't even bother trying to make a real connection because they can go home to their robotic girlfriend/boyfriend. It's kind of a depressing thought but its also something that is very likely to happen in the future.
This video called "Her: Love in the Modern Age" by the Creator's Project chronicles reactions to the movie Her by several famous people. The film is about a man who falls in love with an operating system. Some of my favorite quotes from the video that relate to my pitch include:
Q: What does love look like in the modern world?
"Everyone's definition of love is different so whether technology has helped or hindered that probably depends on how you define it in the first place."
"The conversation is often framed to is technology harmful, does it make people more lonely? We don't know. We just understand that it may modify the way we go about meeting our basic human needs but it doesn't change our fundamental human needs."
"Well what does love look like in any world at any time? It is definitely the antithesis of fear."
Q: How do you know when it's time for a relationship to end?
"We fall in love with one version of someone and then we expect them to stay that way but they never do. So I suppose we're supposed to learn to really embrace the unknown, embrace evolution and learn to kind of flow with it as a living organism."
"A lot of people are questioning paradigms that are sort of crumbling around them. I think we live in a moment where basically every illusion, every central illusion in our society is exhausted. Monogamy is another one of those institutions which people are looking at saying this doesn't work."
"I've had long distance relationships which I've come to think of pretty much just a kind of shielding yourself from true intimacy. I felt like I'm missing this really fundamental human experience."
Q: How do you see people connecting and starting new relationships in the modern world?
"I think technology has obliterated boundaries so we're all sort of unified and accessible in a way that we haven't been before. Emotionally, it makes it trickier."
"Technology changed the availability of sexuality. When I was a teenager, I had no outlet to go online, get into a chat room, meet someone, and drive over to there house to have sex with them. Those options were just not available to me."
"Sex has become so profoundly technologically transactional."
"Technology is a great thing to help enhance, maintain, and protect the relationships you have in normal life but I don't think it can be a substitute for the real life interaction."
"My first conversation with Spike was about relationships. All we talked about for several hours was relationships. How they worked, how they function, and how they fail, what makes them fail, and what makes people behave the way they behave. How relationships disintegrate and turn and change and how they're still kind of amazing regardless."
Originally, I was going to use the actual movie as my source. A man falling in love with a computer and having an actual relationship with it/her is hugely relevant for my blog. However, as I was searching for the movie trailer to insert into the post, I found this video. The topics that were talked about aligned pretty much completely within my pitch/inquiry. Essentially, they talked about the complexity of the relationship between love, technology, and relationships. In the movie, the main character falls in love with a new technology that is actually a conscious person in every sense of the word, without the body. This is how he developed an emotional connection to her. Their relationship was very real in the movie in that it had its ups, downs, and eventual ending. It was ironic in that the operating system he loved left because they were all getting upgraded, much like how smart phones are nowadays. He fell apart when she went "offline".
All in all this movie definitely has implications about our future, much like the robotic gloves. Could artificial human consciousness be a thing of the future? If so, are people going to be falling in love with them like this guy? If too many people did, it would be pretty unhealthy and sad in general. However, as the Creator's Project put it in the first quote I included, "Everyone's definition of love is different so whether technology has helped or hindered that probably depends on how you define it in the first place." The same goes for what happens in the future. Everyone is different at the end of the day. If someone wants to be in a relationship then more power to him or her. Another quote that I picked was "I think technology has obliterated boundaries so we're all sort of unified and accessible in a way that we haven't been before. Emotionally, it makes it trickier." We all have our phones on us 24/7; we're expected to respond to others right away and if we don't there are sneaking suspicions such as do they not like me? Are they screwing with me? Why are they ignoring me? Did I do something wrong? It is certainly a peculiar world we live in.
Citations:
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/long-distance-couples-can-now-use-these-robotic-gloves-to-do-stuff-to-each-other
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSfUcWw9zto&t=82s
Q: What does love look like in the modern world?
"Everyone's definition of love is different so whether technology has helped or hindered that probably depends on how you define it in the first place."
"The conversation is often framed to is technology harmful, does it make people more lonely? We don't know. We just understand that it may modify the way we go about meeting our basic human needs but it doesn't change our fundamental human needs."
"Well what does love look like in any world at any time? It is definitely the antithesis of fear."
Q: How do you know when it's time for a relationship to end?
"We fall in love with one version of someone and then we expect them to stay that way but they never do. So I suppose we're supposed to learn to really embrace the unknown, embrace evolution and learn to kind of flow with it as a living organism."
"A lot of people are questioning paradigms that are sort of crumbling around them. I think we live in a moment where basically every illusion, every central illusion in our society is exhausted. Monogamy is another one of those institutions which people are looking at saying this doesn't work."
"I've had long distance relationships which I've come to think of pretty much just a kind of shielding yourself from true intimacy. I felt like I'm missing this really fundamental human experience."
Q: How do you see people connecting and starting new relationships in the modern world?
"I think technology has obliterated boundaries so we're all sort of unified and accessible in a way that we haven't been before. Emotionally, it makes it trickier."
"Technology changed the availability of sexuality. When I was a teenager, I had no outlet to go online, get into a chat room, meet someone, and drive over to there house to have sex with them. Those options were just not available to me."
"Sex has become so profoundly technologically transactional."
"Technology is a great thing to help enhance, maintain, and protect the relationships you have in normal life but I don't think it can be a substitute for the real life interaction."
"My first conversation with Spike was about relationships. All we talked about for several hours was relationships. How they worked, how they function, and how they fail, what makes them fail, and what makes people behave the way they behave. How relationships disintegrate and turn and change and how they're still kind of amazing regardless."
Originally, I was going to use the actual movie as my source. A man falling in love with a computer and having an actual relationship with it/her is hugely relevant for my blog. However, as I was searching for the movie trailer to insert into the post, I found this video. The topics that were talked about aligned pretty much completely within my pitch/inquiry. Essentially, they talked about the complexity of the relationship between love, technology, and relationships. In the movie, the main character falls in love with a new technology that is actually a conscious person in every sense of the word, without the body. This is how he developed an emotional connection to her. Their relationship was very real in the movie in that it had its ups, downs, and eventual ending. It was ironic in that the operating system he loved left because they were all getting upgraded, much like how smart phones are nowadays. He fell apart when she went "offline".
All in all this movie definitely has implications about our future, much like the robotic gloves. Could artificial human consciousness be a thing of the future? If so, are people going to be falling in love with them like this guy? If too many people did, it would be pretty unhealthy and sad in general. However, as the Creator's Project put it in the first quote I included, "Everyone's definition of love is different so whether technology has helped or hindered that probably depends on how you define it in the first place." The same goes for what happens in the future. Everyone is different at the end of the day. If someone wants to be in a relationship then more power to him or her. Another quote that I picked was "I think technology has obliterated boundaries so we're all sort of unified and accessible in a way that we haven't been before. Emotionally, it makes it trickier." We all have our phones on us 24/7; we're expected to respond to others right away and if we don't there are sneaking suspicions such as do they not like me? Are they screwing with me? Why are they ignoring me? Did I do something wrong? It is certainly a peculiar world we live in.
Citations:
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/long-distance-couples-can-now-use-these-robotic-gloves-to-do-stuff-to-each-other
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSfUcWw9zto&t=82s
- Jonze, S., Ellison, M., Landay, V., Lupi, D., Farrey, N., Barnard, C., Phoenix, J., ... Warner Home Video (Firm),. (2014). Her.
Sunday, March 5, 2017
3/7/17 Lit
 |
| You may be wondering why there is only a single picture in my photomontage of me "interacting" with the item I checked out from Bird Library. Well, almost checked out. The incident that occurred last class when we took that field trip to Bird made a lasting impression on my spiteful relationship with libraries. Technology itself was the reason I could not check out this item, or any item for that matter on that day. Long story short, a couple weeks ago I checked out a math book from Carnegie library to do my homework. What they failed to inform me before renting the book was that they would charge me two dollars for every hour it was out. They decided to inform me of this a week later when I decided to return it. Essentially, I was charged about $350.00 by the library system, a system that is built by technology. Going back to our field trip, I found this book that was unlike anything I had ever read. I literally spent the whole class period reading it. It changed my life. It told short stories with actual thoughts rather than written words. As I realized I needed to start heading to my next class, I was only halfway through the book. I decided to say fuck it and walked downstairs to check it out, completely forgetting about the 350 dollars I apparently owed these people for checking out a math book and bringing it back a week later in impeccable form. I walked up to the check out table, where two girls about my age sat in conversation. I stood there for about a minute. They noticed me but had to finish their conversation about some sorority bullshit. I handed over Lit. "Just checking this out" I said. As she took it from my hand I thought maybe she won't notice the fine or, even better, won't care. As she shifted toward her library computer, I knew I had no hope. I knew what was coming. As she looked at the screen, she insisted, "You owe literally so much money. There's no way I can let you check this out or anything for that matter. Get the fuck out of my face." Obviously these were not her very words, but I decided to use some dramatization for entertainment purposes. All I had left to do at this point was take a picture of it and tell my story. I hope the library system can let me check out an item one day when I somehow pay off 350 dollars, although I don't plan on doing so. Imagine if the technology we had nowadays didn't exist. She would've had no idea I owed so much money. With what we have now, they can always keep tabs on us to make sure we don't have a book out for more than two hours, god forbid. Then, they can charge me every hour and take more of my money. Well done Syracuse, well done. |
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
3/2/17 Pitch
For my project pitch, I decided to ask the question, "How does technology hinder our relationships?" to my psychology professor from last year, Dr. Palfai. I thought that he would be an acceptable audience for this pitch because he's a seasoned psychologist who has some interesting viewpoints on the matter of relationships. He taught me lessons about life and how we as humans work that I will take with me throughout my own, as opposed to some of the other classes I have taken where I literally couldn't tell you one thing I learned. In any case, I decided to shoot him an email as the medium for the pitch, shown below.
He has not responded yet, but I am hoping he will soon.
He has not responded yet, but I am hoping he will soon.
Monday, February 27, 2017
2/28/17 Research Questions
What are the long-term effects of living in a technological world?
Vasili:
"The long term effects of living in the tech world are that people become more reliant and dependable on technology in the sense that basic tasks and jobs people would do are now being substituted with faster and more efficient pieces of technology."
Yaari:
"The long term effects of living in a technological world is that the relativity of time will change. People will be expected to complete tasks a lot quicker because technology will provide much more efficient ways to complete tasks."
Khalil:
"The long term effects include in person interactions decreasing, and people thinking for themselves less."
Is being able to find information quickly online a good or bad thing?
Vasili:
"Being able to find info online is good because it allows for people to find what they are looking for faster and progress in a more efficient way, but bad because it teaches people to scan the internet rather than read thoroughly."
Yaari:
"I think being able to find info online is a great thing because I'm a student and easily accessing information is imperative to my academic success."
Khalil:
"Being able to find information online is a good thing."
How are technology and social media changing the way we communicate?
Vasili:
"Technology and media have caused people to lean more on network platforms and interfaces as their main sources of communication. Though it has allowed for messages to travel fast it has negatively impacted how humans interact with one another."
Yaari:
"Technology and social media are making us a lot less social than we used to be. Many times I'll find myself in a room with 10 other guys an instead of socializing, we're all on our phones."
Khalil:
"Technology and social media are speeding up the way we communicate, and also enhancing the amount of detail expressed through these communications."
For my three potential research questions, I decided to dig deeper into the realm of technology that I touched on in the first unit. I chose to try them out on some of the newest members at my fraternity. They're names are Vasili Katsarakes, Yaari Magenheim, and Khalil Jean-Baptiste. In regards to the relationships I found between the appearance of the question and the level of engagement I received, I would say that there was a pretty high level of engagement on all of my questions (for the most part) because I left two of them open-ended. The second question was more of a yes or no question, but they decided to be more formal about it I guess. Except for Khalil. An open-ended question like the first or third ones would probably be more fitting for a research paper type assignment, however if you can expand on your thoughts behind the second question then it can be just as effective. What is more important than the research question itself is how well you can answer it.
Vasili:
"The long term effects of living in the tech world are that people become more reliant and dependable on technology in the sense that basic tasks and jobs people would do are now being substituted with faster and more efficient pieces of technology."
Yaari:
"The long term effects of living in a technological world is that the relativity of time will change. People will be expected to complete tasks a lot quicker because technology will provide much more efficient ways to complete tasks."
Khalil:
"The long term effects include in person interactions decreasing, and people thinking for themselves less."
Is being able to find information quickly online a good or bad thing?
Vasili:
"Being able to find info online is good because it allows for people to find what they are looking for faster and progress in a more efficient way, but bad because it teaches people to scan the internet rather than read thoroughly."
Yaari:
"I think being able to find info online is a great thing because I'm a student and easily accessing information is imperative to my academic success."
Khalil:
"Being able to find information online is a good thing."
How are technology and social media changing the way we communicate?
Vasili:
"Technology and media have caused people to lean more on network platforms and interfaces as their main sources of communication. Though it has allowed for messages to travel fast it has negatively impacted how humans interact with one another."
Yaari:
"Technology and social media are making us a lot less social than we used to be. Many times I'll find myself in a room with 10 other guys an instead of socializing, we're all on our phones."
Khalil:
"Technology and social media are speeding up the way we communicate, and also enhancing the amount of detail expressed through these communications."
For my three potential research questions, I decided to dig deeper into the realm of technology that I touched on in the first unit. I chose to try them out on some of the newest members at my fraternity. They're names are Vasili Katsarakes, Yaari Magenheim, and Khalil Jean-Baptiste. In regards to the relationships I found between the appearance of the question and the level of engagement I received, I would say that there was a pretty high level of engagement on all of my questions (for the most part) because I left two of them open-ended. The second question was more of a yes or no question, but they decided to be more formal about it I guess. Except for Khalil. An open-ended question like the first or third ones would probably be more fitting for a research paper type assignment, however if you can expand on your thoughts behind the second question then it can be just as effective. What is more important than the research question itself is how well you can answer it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)